This is the recommended procedure to manually design a secure FireHOL firewall. It applies to FireHOL 2.x versions, which understand both IPv4 and IPv6.
Note: this tutorial currently focusses on IPv4. It needs updating to include interface6 and how to merge the results. Meantime, please follow this guide, then read the upgrade pages which will explain how to introduce IPv6 to your firewall.
Network interfaces are there for some reason. You have to do
something about all the interfaces of your host. If you don’t do
something at the firewall level with a network interface, then it
depends of the firewall policy what will happen with traffic on this
interface. By default FireHOL will drop all
traffic coming in and going out via an undefined network interface, so
the network interface will have no meaning to be up and running. This is
a common mistake on some ADSL configurations, where users ignore the
loop device that connects the Linux router with the ADSL device. To
identify your network interfaces use the ip link show command. The example below shows my
home router ip link show output:
[root@gateway /]# ip link show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
    link/ether 00:50:fc:21:9a:ab brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
12: ppp0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 3
    link/pppThere are a few important thinks to always remember:
lo exists on all machines and is used
for communication between programs running on this machine. FireHOL
handles this automatically. You don’t have to do anything about lo.lo
interface) are used for two purposes:
In the above example, it is clear that I have two network interfaces
(except lo): eth0 and ppp0.
One extra step is to identify if the network interfaces appearing
here might dynamically change during run-time. For example my ppp0 might become ppp1 or ppp2 in
certain cases. To overcome this problem, I can say that my link to the
outside world is not ppp0 but ppp+. The plus character matches all the
interfaces that begin with the text given before the
plus sign. In this case, it matches all the possible network interfaces
that start with ppp.
Keep in mind that FireHOL (and iptables) does not really care if the interface defined in a firewall actually exists or not. This means that you can setup firewalls on interfaces that might become available later or altered during run time. This also means that if you define an interface with a wrong name, FireHOL and iptables will not complain.
Now I have to assign a role to each network interface, i.e. what is the function of each of those interfaces? For this, I create a table similar to the one below. It is important to focus on the requests; forget the replies.
| interface | description | incoming requests | outgoing requests | routing requests in | routing requests out | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eth0 | My home LAN | Many services from my LAN workstations (i.e. dns, ftp, samba, squid, dhcp, http, ssh, icmp) | A few services my LAN workstations provide (i.e. samba, icmp) | All LAN workstations requests going to the internet | Nothing | 
| ppp+ | The Internet | I run a public mailer, a public web server and a public ftp server for my domain | All the services my Linux could ask from the internet | Nothing | All LAN workstations requests going to the internet | 
Keep in mind that:
So, the above could also be presented as:
| interface | name | servers provided | clients used | routing clients | routing servers | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eth0 | home | dns, ftp, samba, squid, dhcp, http, ssh, icmp | samba, icmp | all | none | 
| ppp+ | internet | smtp, http, ftp | all | none | all | 
This table can easily be transformed into FireHOL rules.
Now that you have a list of all the interfaces and their roles, it is time to start writing the FireHOL configuration file. First write one interface statement for each network interface you identified above:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
interface4 ppp+ internetNow, we can add the servers for each interface (based on the table above). Remember that these servers are all running on the firewall host:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
    server dns   accept
    server ftp   accept
    server samba accept
    server squid accept
    server dhcp  accept
    server http  accept
    server ssh   accept
    server icmp  accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
    server smtp  accept
    server http  accept
    server ftp   acceptNow, we can add the clients for each interface. Remember that these clients are all running on the firewall host:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
    server dns   accept
    server ftp   accept
    server samba accept
    server squid accept
    server dhcp  accept
    server http  accept
    server ssh   accept
    server icmp  accept
    client samba accept
    client icmp  accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
    server smtp  accept
    server http  accept
    server ftp   accept
    client all   acceptAt this point, everyone should be able to inter-operate correctly
with the firewall host, but still we don’t route any traffic. This means
that the Linux box can “see” all the workstations on the LAN and these
workstations can “see” the Linux box, also that the Linux box can “see”
the Internet and the Internet can “see” the servers of the ppp+ interface of the Linux box, but the LAN
workstations cannot “see” the Internet.
It is now time to setup routing. To do this we will have to define a set of routers for all the interface combinations. This means that if we have two interfaces we will have to define two routers. If we have 3 interfaces, we will have to define 6 routers, and so on.
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
    server dns   accept
    server ftp   accept
    server samba accept
    server squid accept
    server dhcp  accept
    server http  accept
    server ssh   accept
    server icmp  accept
    client samba accept
    client icmp  accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
    server smtp accept
    server http accept
    server ftp  accept
    client all   accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0Remember that inface and
outface match the
requests, not the replies. This means that the router
home2internet matches all requests originated from
eth0 and going out to ppp+ (and of course their relative replies in
the opposite direction), while the router internet2home
matches all the requests from the Internet to the home LAN (and their
relative replies back).
Now, based on the roles table of the previous section we see that we
should route all requests coming in from eth0 and going out to ppp+, and not route any request coming from the
Internet and going out to the home LAN. Here it is:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
    server dns   accept
    server ftp   accept
    server samba accept
    server squid accept
    server dhcp  accept
    server http  accept
    server ssh   accept
    server icmp  accept
    client samba accept
    client icmp  accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
    server smtp accept
    server http accept
    server ftp  accept
    client all   accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    route all accept
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0This is it. We are done! (for the filtering part of the firewall. Look below for setting up NAT too.)
To save typing time, you can use this:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    client all             accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    route all acceptNote that we can remove any router statements not having any rules in them, so the internet2home router has been eliminated.
We might want to have extra checks on each interface to prevent
spoofing. To find the IPs of your network interfaces use ip addr show and to find the IP networks behind
each interface use ip route show.
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    client all             accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    route all acceptUNROUTABLE IPS is a variable defined by FireHOL and contains all the IPs that should not be routed on the internet.
If home LAN did not have real IP addresses, we would have to add a masquerade command in our router:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    client all             accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    masquerade
    route all acceptThe masquerade command sets itself up on the outface of a router.
We can now protect our ppp interface even further. For this we use the protection command:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
    protection strong 10/sec 10
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    client all             accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    masquerade
    route all acceptIt could be nice if instead of dropping wrong packets originated from the Ethernet, to reject them so that our workstations will not have to timeout if we do something that is not allowed. To do this we use the policy command:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
    policy reject
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
    protection strong 10/sec 10
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    client all             accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    masquerade
    route all acceptSome servers on the Internet try to ident back the client to find information about the user requesting the service. With our current firewall, such servers will have to timeout before accepting our request. To speed thinks up we could write:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
    policy reject
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
    protection strong 10/sec 10
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    server ident reject with tcp-reset
    client all             accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
    masquerade
    route all accept
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0
    route ident reject with tcp-resetNote that we now have added the router we eliminated above, since we need to add a service to it.
The whole routing schema could be rewritten as:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
    policy reject
    server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp"        accept
    client "samba icmp"                                    accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
    protection strong 10/sec 10
    server "smtp http ftp" accept
    client all             accept
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0
    masquerade reverse
    client all   accept
    server ident reject with tcp-resetNow we have elicited the first router, but we defined everything in the second. We have used the reverse keyword in masquerade to make it set up in inface this time.
We could use the first router (home2internet) to do everything, but then the client and server commands would need be reversed (server all, client ident) which would be confusing.